Risk, Aspect & Hazard Register
Management-system standards open at the risk register, and a tool named after a register that cannot hold one is no use in the room. One row per risk, aspect or hazard: what it is, the process it belongs to, your own assessment of it before and after controls, the action, who owns it and when it is due. The panel counts open actions, how many are past the date YOU set, and how many rows are sitting without an owner - which is the most common reason a register fails a review. No scoring scale is imposed: you record the one your procedure uses, in your own words.
Your database
Fields
| Field | Type |
|---|---|
| Reference | text |
| Type | select |
| Process / area | text |
| What could happen | text |
| Your assessment before controls | text |
| Controls already in place | text |
| Your assessment after controls | text |
| Action required | text |
| Owner | text |
| Due | date |
| State | select |
| Last reviewed | date |
Frequently asked
Where is this stored?
Only on this device, in your browser. Nothing is uploaded and there is no account. Export to CSV or JSON to back it up, hand it to an auditor, or move it to another machine.
Does it know my deadlines and required frequencies?
No, and that is deliberate. Inspection intervals, retention periods and review cadences are set by your standard, your jurisdiction, your certifier or your own procedure, and they change. This runs offline and cannot know if one changed last month, so it never asserts one. You enter the dates that apply to you and it does the arithmetic on those.
Does it score risk for me?
No. Likelihood and severity scales differ between organisations and between standards, and a number this tool invented would be one you could not defend. You record the assessment your procedure produces, and the register keeps it beside the action.